Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Bonner's conjectural recovery of lost portions of Tyconius, on the basis of material common to Bede and other writers who drew on Tyconius independently, in this case Caesarius and (also Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (a conjecture also supported also by the presence of a similar comment in Beatus, In Apocalipsin).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
The common source behind both Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's commentary (supporting evidence also from Primasius and Beatus).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Bede here cited Tyconius by name. The portion to which he referred is lost but a parallel to Bede's citation may be found in Caesarius's Expositio de Apocalypsi, which also drew substantially upon Tyconius.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Lo Bue conjectures that at this point the Turin fragments do not preserve the exact wording of the Tyconian text, which is represented by Caesarius (and by Beatus of Liebana), in the same form as that quoted here by Bede.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Regula (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Bonner suggested Tyconius as the source here, i.e. a lost portion of his Commentarius in Apocalypsim recoverable on the basis of material common to Bede and others who drew on Tyconius independently. It is equally possible that Bede derived this material from Primasius (who himself drawn on Tyconius), even though Bede names Tyconius explicitly here.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Primasius).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved in Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Text:
Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis
Edition:
PL, 93, 129-206.
Reference:
L.F.2.16
Created:
2000-08-22
Project Name:
Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register
Website:
https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/
Date Accessed:
2026-09-12
252.23
in ipsis aquis in aquae sordibus et caeno volutantur
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII, and by Primasius, Commentarius in Apocalypsim).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Text:
Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis
Edition:
PL, 93, 129-206.
Reference:
L.F.2.16
Created:
2000-08-22
Project Name:
Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register
Website:
https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/
Date Accessed:
2026-09-12
262.5-6
de ecclesia enim exeunt … visibiles et invisibiles
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
The majority of the MSS of Expositio in Apocalypsim read 'praedicationem' for 'praedicatorem'. Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Text:
Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis
Edition:
PL, 93, 129-206.
Reference:
L.F.2.16
Created:
2000-08-22
Project Name:
Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register
Website:
https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/
Date Accessed:
2026-09-12
266.11-12
iocunditatem dicit transire … adiecit causam dicens
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim.
Since it is not thought that Bede had read Caesarius on the Apocalypse, the common source for Caesarius and Bede is presumed to be a now lost portion of Tyconius's Commentarius in Apocalypsim (also preserved by Beatus of Liebana, In Apocalypsim Libri XII).
Contributor:
R.C. Love
Created:
2000-08-22
×
How to cite
For referencing this record, please use the following:
R.C. Love, Bede: Explanatio Apocalypsis, PL, 2000-08-22, Fontes Anglo-Saxonici: World Wide Web Register, https://arts.st-andrews.ac.uk/fontes/, accessed 2026-09-12
Alternatively, please use the following information:
